Thoughts on the Market: Inflation

May 12, 2021

Inflation is the word of the year so far in financial markets. There seems to be a major news item daily on the subject, including this morning’s data showing the highest yearly consumer prices increase since 2008. While it is still unclear if inflation will be higher than current market expectations over the coming years, today we want to cover how we at GGS are thinking about inflation and positioning client portfolios for this possibility.

First, let’s look at current market expectations for inflation.

    • The expected future US inflation rate for the next ten years is now 2.5%, the highest the measure has been since 2013. It has been rising steadily since hitting its low of roughly 0.5% in March 2020.1
    • The median expected US inflation rate for the next year is 3.4%, also the highest since 2013.2

Key takeaway: Investors are currently expecting higher near-term and long-term inflation levels than anything we have experienced in the past eight years. This is already priced into financial assets. What matters for asset prices going forward is how inflation rates evolve versus these current expectations.

Main arguments for and against higher inflation:

Near-term, the rapid reopening of the global economy, significant government stimulus, and pandemic-related supply-chain disruptions have led to near-term demand running higher than near-term supply in multiple major economic sectors. This is a recipe for higher prices and is the primary reason inflation expectations for the next year are so high, along with year-over-year comparisons to an economy in lockdown. However, these supply shortages, reopening/stimulus-driven demand, and skewed annual comparisons are viewed as temporary, so even if near-term inflation readings come in higher than investor expectations, markets may not react very much.

Long-term, we believe these are the two main arguments for higher inflation:

    1.  Political/Federal Reserve messaging: Some analysts believe there has been a political shift in favor of higher inflation as a way to combat record high government debt levels. In general, inflation is good for debtors as the money they eventually return is not as valuable as the money they receive now. The Federal Reserve has also recently relaxed its stance from explicitly targeting 2.0% inflation to targeting a 2.0% inflation average, thus allowing inflation to temporarily rise above 2.0% given it has spent so much time recently under 2.0%.
    2.  Aging demographics/deglobalization: The last 40 years have seen a huge expansion of the global labor workforce from demographics (number of working-age adults), the entrance of women into the workforce, and increased globalization. The global labor workforce will now likely be shrinking for the next 40 years due to aging demographics and recent deglobalization forces, which should increase labor’s power to demand higher wages, leading to higher inflation.3

Yet, there are also two main counter-balancing forces against higher inflation:

    1. Continued automation and technological progress that increases productivity and decreases labor’s bargaining power versus machines.
    2. A weaker than expected economic recovery going forward: Since 2010, many investors have been afraid of pending inflation following the large expansion of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet from its Quantitative Easing program. Those investors thus far have experienced “Waiting for Godot” as global crises have helped keep demand-led inflation at bay (European sovereign debt/Euro-collapse fears of 2010-2013, Chinese economic growth worries in 2015-2016, global trade war of 2017-present, COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-present).4 In short, an inflation boom sparked primarily by continued significant economic demand growth requires a lot to go right.

Implications for GGS portfolio management

At GGS, our research focus is on finding high quality, undervalued companies and building clients a properly diversified portfolio. We do not focus our research on whether future market inflation (and by extension, interest rate) expectations are too high or too low, and thus we are not placing a significant bet one way or the other in client portfolios. We are aware of which sectors and asset classes do best when inflation/interest rates are rising (banks, cyclical/commodity industries) and which do worst (long-duration bonds, bond-like equities, high growth stocks). We own both of these groups in client portfolios and will continue to own both. Our focus is on managing inflation/interest rate exposure at the aggregate portfolio level and maintaining roughly the same exposure as our benchmark. We believe that our stock picking and disciplined portfolio/risk management are the key drivers of long-term success for our clients, not trying to make a significant bet on market timing, interest rates, or inflation.


3 Bernstein Research. Inflation and the Shape of Portfolios. May 6, 2021.
4 JPMorgan Research. Positioning for Inflation. May 5, 2021.

Galvin, Gaustad & Stein (“GG&S”) is an SEC registered investment adviser located in Scottsdale, Arizona. GG&S and its representatives are in compliance with the current registration and notice filing requirements imposed upon SEC registered investment advisers by those states in which GG&S maintains clients. GG&S may only transact business in those states in which it is notice filed, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from notice filing requirements. GG&S’s web site is limited to the dissemination of general information regarding its investment advisory services to United States residents residing in states where providing such information is not prohibited by applicable law. Accordingly, the publication of GG&S’s web site on the Internet should not be construed by any consumer and/or prospective client as GG&S’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect transactions in securities, or the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, over the Internet. Furthermore, the information resulting from the use of tools or other information on this Internet site should not be construed, in any manner whatsoever, as the receipt of, or a substitute for, personalized individual advice from GG&S. Any subsequent, direct communication by GG&S with a prospective client shall be conducted by a representative that is either registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration in the state where the prospective client resides. For information pertaining to the registration status of GG&S, please contact the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on their web site at A copy of GG&S’s current written disclosure statement discussing GG&S’s business operations, services, and fees is available from GG&S upon written request. GG&S does not make any representations as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to GG&S’s web site or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility therefore. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.

Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. (CFP Board) owns the certification marks CFP and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER in the U.S., which it awards to individuals who successfully complete CFP Board's initial and ongoing certification requirements.

CFA and Chartered Financial Analyst are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute. GIPS® is a registered trademark of CFA Institute. CFA Institute does not endorse or promote this organization, nor does it warrant the accuracy or quality of the content contained herein.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and may have been impacted by market events and economic conditions that will not prevail in the future. This site/blog contains certain forward‐looking statements (which may be signaled by words such as “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate”)which indicate future possibilities. Due to known and unknown risks, other uncertainties and factors, actual results may differ materially from the expectations portrayed in such forward‐looking statements. As such, there is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this letter will come to pass.


Relationship Summary (ADV Part 3)